Skip Navigation

Age and Ageing 2006 35(2):183-185; doi:10.1093/ageing/afj043
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoni, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoni, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Research Letter

An early drop in systolic blood pressure predicts a positive tilt table test in elderly patients with unexplained falls or syncope

SIR—Syncope and unexplained falls are frequent reasons for emergency room visits and hospital admissions in elderly patients [1]. Results from the Framingham study showed that 10.5% of the population experienced one or more syncopal events during a 17-year period of observation. Although the overall incidence was 6.2 events per 1000 person-years, rates were significantly higher in elderly subjects (17 per 1000 person-years in males and 19 per 1000 person-years in females aged ≥80 years) [2]. Syncope has been reported to account for 3% of hospital emergency visits and 1–6% of admissions [3, 4].

The tilt table test (TTT) is a valuable diagnostic tool to evaluate patients with syncope and unexplained falls [5, 6]. The safety of TTT has been proven in a large number of elderly patients [7]. A positive TTT (TTT+) is defined by a drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥50 mmHg, with production of symptoms of pre-syncope or syncope (with or without changes in heart rate) [6, 8]. TTT is usually conducted over 30–45 minutes with a technician and physician in attendance. Shorter durations are often offset by pharmacologic challenge (e.g. glyceryl trinitrate) [6]. The time and staffing requirements make TTT relatively underutilised in most centres. Therefore, any strategy that will allow better case selection or a shortened testing regimen may improve patient care.

The predictors of TTT+ remain largely unknown. It is theoretically possible that global autonomic dysfunction in these patients leads to significant haemodynamic changes during the early phases of tilting, antedating the dramatic blood pressure fall later during the test. However, the co-existence of other factors potentially affecting these changes, such as age, co-morbidities and different drug classes, prompts the need for adequately powered studies to adjust for these variables.

The main aim of our study was to identify the predictors of TTT+. In particular, we speculated that abnormal early haemodynamic responses to tilting might predict the test outcome.


    Methods
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
We performed a TTT on 161 elderly patients (mean age 80.9 ± 5.9 years, mean ± SD), consecutively referred for tilt table testing in our Institution, for investigation of unexplained falls and/or syncope/pre-syncope. Exclusion criteria included history of ventricular arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome or cerebrovascular accident within the last 3 months, documented severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, critical cardiac valvular lesions and Mini-Mental State Examination score <20 of 30. In addition, 15 subjects declined enrolment because of either physical inability to stand for the required time or pain. The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki after being approved by the local research ethics committee. Each subject gave written informed consent before starting the study.

Tilt table test protocol
The tests were performed in a quiet room with dim lighting. Patients remained on their usual medications prior to testing. A qualified nurse and physician were present at all times. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured continuously using finger plethysmograph and surface electrocardiograph, respectively (TaskForce Monitor, CNSystems, Graz, Austria). After 10 minutes of resting supine, patients were tilted to 70° head-up. The tests were limited to 45 minutes. A drop in SBP ≥50 mmHg with production of any symptoms of pre-syncope or syncope was considered a positive test (with or without changes in heart rate).


    Statistical analysis
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
Differences between groups were assessed using two-way ANOVA. Predictors of TTT+ were identified by performing a backward regression analysis including the following 16 variables into the model: age, history of cardiac failure, ischaemic heart disease, arrhythmia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, cerebrovascular disease, folate/vitamin B12 deficiency, current therapy with anti-psychotics, benzodiazepines, ß-blockers, renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers and diuretics (SPSS for Windows 11.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Given that at least 10 subjects per each variable are required for the analysis, a population size of 161 subjects was considered adequate for the purposes of the study. A P value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.


    Results
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
The test was positive in 28 patients (17.4%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between TTT+ and TTT– subjects (Table 1). However, patients with TTT+ had a significant fall in SBP after 2 minutes of tilting compared with TTT– patients (–13.8 ± 25.8 versus –3.2 ± 16.1 mmHg, P = 0.006). Thirteen of 28 TTT+ patients (46.4%) had an SBP fall >15 mmHg. A significantly smaller proportion of patients (30 of 133, 22.6%, P = 0.018) with TTT– had SBP fall >15 mmHg at 2 minutes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Clinical characteristics by tilt table test result

 

Backward regression analysis showed that the degree of SBP fall at 2 minutes of tilting strongly and independently predicted TTT+ (Table 2). However, the regression model only accounted for 5.8% of the overall variability. The rate of TTT+ in patients with unexplained falls without documented syncope and those with syncope or symptoms of pre-syncope was similar (17.6 and 17.2%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. Predictors of tilt table test outcome. Last three steps of backward regression analysis

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
In this study, we sought to identify factors which might allow the early prediction of TTT+. Of the factors we considered, only the fall in SBP at 2 minutes after tilting had significant predictive value (P = 0.014), suggesting the presence of a global deficit in autonomic function in TTT+ patients. When this fall was considered as a percentage of baseline SBP, there was even stronger predictive value (P = 0.007).

Because it is a relatively simple and integral part of the clinical assessment of patients with falls/syncope, we postulated that the measurement of postural drop in SBP should influence the decision to perform a TTT. However, because it is not feasible to apply a complex mathematical model to every patient’s TTT results, as a practical solution, we applied an SBP drop at 2 minutes >15 mmHg as a cut-off and found that it retained predictive value (P = 0.018). Using a more familiar cut-off of 20 mmHg did not have predictive value, however.

We did not identify or exclude subjects with postural hypotension prior to testing. As postural hypotension is known to be associated with autonomic dysfunction, this may be a confounding variable.

Although these findings might be applied clinically to improve case selection, the fact that the regression model only accounted for a small proportion of the overall variability indicates that there are other factors that need to be considered, in addition to blood pressure changes, before prediction of a positive test may be achieved.


    Key points
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 

  • The TTT is an important, well-tolerated, safe test to investigate syncope and falls in elderly people.
  • In our series, 17.4% of tests were positive, which is consistent with previously published data.
  • A fall in SBP, 2 minutes after 70° head-up tilt, is associated with a positive test result; however, this cannot be considered as a sole predictor of a positive TTT.
  • In a clinical setting, a postural decrease in SBP of 15 mmHg may be a more useful predictor than the traditional cut-off of 20 mmHg.


    Funding
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
The study was funded by the Flinders Medical Centre Foundation and The Flinders Institute for Health and Medical Research.

Derek Yiu1, Zbigniew Gieroba2, Karen Hall1, Sharon Mackintosh3, Andrew Russell3 and Arduino A. Mangoni1,*

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia Tel: (+61) 8 8204 5202 Fax: (+61) 8 8204 5114 Email: arduino.mangoni{at}fmc.sa.gov.au
2 Department of Rehabilitation, Aged Care and Allied Health, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia
3 Department of Cardiology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 
We are deeply indebted to Mrs Helen Wright for her superb technical assistance.


    References
 Top
 Methods
 Statistical analysis
 Results
 Discussion
 Key points
 Funding
 References
 

  1. Chen-Scarabelli C, Scarabelli TM. Neurocardiogenic syncope. BMJ 2004; 329: 336–41.[Free Full Text]
  2. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 878–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Day SC, Cook EF, Funkenstein H, Goldman L. Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. Am J Med 1982; 73: 15–23.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Silverstein MD, Singer DE, Mulley AG, Thibault GE, Barnett GO. Patients with syncope admitted to medical intensive care units. JAMA 1982; 248: 1185–9.[Abstract]
  5. Benditt DG, Ferguson DW, Grubb BP et al. Tilt table testing for assessing syncope. American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 263–75.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Parry SW, Kenny RA. The role of tilt table testing in neurocardiocascular instability in older adults. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 370–2.[Free Full Text]
  7. Gieroba ZJ, Newton JL, Parry SW, Norton M, Lawson J, Kenny RA. Unprovoked and glyceryl trinitrate-provoked head-up tilt table test is safe in older people: a review of 10 years’ experience. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 1913–15.[Medline]
  8. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope—update 2004. Europace 2004; 6: 467–537.[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoni, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoni, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?