Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on September 19, 2007
Age and Ageing 2007 36(5):549-554; doi:10.1093/ageing/afm108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/549    most recent
afm108v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schäufele, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Köhler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schäufele, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Proxy screening tools improve the recognition of dementia in old-age homes: results of a validation study

Leonore Köhler, Siegfried Weyerer and Martina Schäufele

Centre: Psychogeriatric Research Unit, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany

Address correspondence to: Dr. Martina Schäufele. Tel: (+49) 621 1703 6352; Fax: (+49) 621 1205. Email: martina.schaeufele{at}zi-mannheim.de

Background: Despite the high true prevalence of dementia, demential disorders of residents of old age homes may often be not recognized. There is a need for a standardised tool which includes observations of nursing staff.

Objective: To describe and validate the Dementia Screening Scale (DSS) for use by nursing staff in old-age homes.

Methods: All residents of 20 randomly selected old age homes in the city of Mannheim, Germany (n = 1, 922) were rated by nurses using the seven-item proxy dementia rating scale. Based on a subset of residents (n = 598) the DSS was validated against independent diagnostic assessments made by trained psychologists including the Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE), the Dementia Scale of the Brief Assessment Schedule (BAS DEM), and the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).

Results: Using the CDR as a gold standard, the DSS correctly classified at a cut-off of 2/3, 85.8% of the mildly, moderately, or severely demented residents. The accuracy of the DSS was only a little worse than that of the MMSE and the BAS DEM.

Conclusion: The DSS is well-suited for the recognition of dementia in old age homes. It achieved a better validity than global diagnosis-related staff assessments and compared to performance-based instruments. It is easier to apply, more economic, and associated with a fewer rate of non-response.

Keywords: screening, dementia, validation study, nursing homes, proxy, elderly

Received 30 November 2006; accepted in revised form 24 April 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
S. Cahill, A. M. Diaz-Ponce, R. F. Coen, and C. Walsh
The underdetection of cognitive impairment in nursing homes in the Dublin area. The need for on-going cognitive assessment
Age Ageing, November 20, 2009; (2009) afp198v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
G. Meyer, S. Kopke, B. Haastert, and I. Muhlhauser
Comparison of a fall risk assessment tool with nurses' judgement alone: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Age Ageing, July 1, 2009; 38(4): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.