Skip Navigation


Age and Ageing Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2007
Age and Ageing 2007 36(6):663-669; doi:10.1093/ageing/afm077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/6/663    most recent
afm077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trigg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Skevington, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trigg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Skevington, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Can people with mild to moderate dementia provide reliable answers about their quality of life?

Richard Trigg1,*, Roy W. Jones2 and Suzanne M. Skevington1

1 Department of Psychology, WHO Centre for the Study of Quality of Life, University of Bath,UK
2 Research Institute for the Care of the Elderly, Bath, UK

Adress correspondence to: Dr Richard Trigg Tel: +44 (0)115 8485603. Email: Richard.trigg{at}ntu.ac.uk

Background: cognitive limitations and lack of insight have been seen as barriers to self-reporting in quality of life (QoL) assessment of people with dementia. However growing evidence suggests that people with mild to moderate dementia may be able to complete standardised questionnaire items and articulate feelings, providing reliable evaluations of their health and QoL.

Objective: to examine the reliability of the item pool of a new measure of self-reported QoL, the Bath Assessment of Subjective Quality of Life in Dementia (BASQID)

Subjects: sixty people with mild to moderate dementia, recruited from a memory clinic.

Methods: participants completed 44 items from an initial draft of the BASQID and 30 completed the items on a second occasion, 2 weeks later. Item analytic criteria, including item facility, score distributions, tests of internal consistency and reproducibility, were used to reduce the item pool, and the reliability of the reduced pool was examined.

Results: twenty items were removed from the item pool. All retained items had at least moderate test-retest reliability ({kappa} >0.41), with 13 items displaying good to very good reliability ({kappa} >0.61). These 24 items were internally consistent (alpha = 0.91), and the total score had a good 2-week test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82 (0.66–0.91).

Conclusions: participants were able to complete items relating to feelings and evaluations of a range of QoL domains. The consistency of responses over a 2-week period suggests that self-reported QoL assessments are feasible and appropriate for people with mild to moderate dementia.

Keywords: dementia, quality of life, outcome assessment, reproducibility of results, elderly

Received 1 February 2007; accepted in revised form 3 May 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.