Skip Navigation



Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on September 22, 2004
Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afh202
© 2004 by British Geriatrics Society
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/6/608    most recent
afh202v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blacktop, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blacktop, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received January 19, 2004
Accepted June 21, 2004

Article

Avoidance hierarchies and preferences for anticoagulation--semi-qualitative analysis of older patients' views about stroke prevention and the use of warfarin

Richard Fuller 1*, Nigel Dudley 2, and Jon Blacktop 3

1 Medical Department for the Elderly, The General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
2 Elderly Services, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
3 School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Ftworf{at}aol.com.


  Abstract

Objective: To examine older patients' preferences regarding the use of warfarin to prevent atrial fibrillation related strokes when faced with cumulative probabilities of treatment risk and benefit.

Design: A semi-qualitative researcher administered questionnaire and interview.

Subjects: 81 patients attending a general elderly medicine outpatient clinic.

Results: Up to 50% of participants would decline warfarin treatment when shown both cumulative benefits of stroke risk reduction and risk of intracerebral haemorrhage. Principal themes highlighted concepts of gambling and trade offs relating to risk and benefit. Attitudes about stroke and negative perceptions of intracerebral haemorrhage were major contributory themes in the decision to refuse warfarin treatment.

Conclusion: Older people use very individualistic health beliefs in judging how to trade risks to preserve quality of life. Carefully explaining risk information and listening to elders' views and reasoning is likely to result in a more informed choice regarding the use of anticoagulation in stroke prevention.

Keywords: stroke, anticoagulation, risk, patient preferences, elderly.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
K. Fletcher, J. Mant, R. Holder, D. Fitzmaurice, G. Y. Lip, and F. R. Hobbs
An analysis of factors that predict patient consent to take part in a randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2007; 24(4): 388 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
C. M. Morrison, N. Gainsborough, and C. Rajkumar
Warfarin versus aspirin in the elderly in primary prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation
Age Ageing, March 1, 2007; 36(2): 117 - 119.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Age AgeingHome page
A. K. Das, L. Das, and G. P. Mulley
Awareness of living wills in the United Kingdom
Age Ageing, September 1, 2006; 35(5): 543 - 543.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
R Fuller and N J Dudley
Atrial fibrillation: will new drugs and patient choice improve anticoagulation outcomes?
Heart, April 1, 2005; 91(4): 423 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.