Skip Navigation



Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on March 2, 2006

Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afj054
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/240    most recent
afj054v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perneczky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perneczky, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received November 12, 2005
Accepted January 18, 2006

Article

Complex activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment: conceptual and diagnostic issues

Robert Perneczky 1 *, Corina Pohl 1, Christian Sorg 1, Julia Hartmann 1, Katja Komossa 1, Panagiotis Alexopoulos 2, Stefan Wagenpfeil 3, and Alexander Kurz 1

1 Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität München, Germany, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany
2 Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität München, Germany, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universität Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
3 Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technische Universität München, Germany, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robert Perneczky, E-mail: robert.perneczky{at}lrz.tum.de


   Abstract

Background: The impact of cognitive impairment on activities of daily living (ADL) is being used as a major criterion for differentiating between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. The concept of an ADL threshold that separates MCI from dementia, however, appears to be improbable for several reasons.

Objectives: To determine whether complex ADL are impaired in patients with MCI; to examine the usefulness of the assessment of ADL impairment for the diagnosis of MCI; to explore whether both cognitive testing and assessment of impaired ADL are significant predictors of the diagnosis according to the diagnostic gold standard of MCI.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: University-based outpatient clinic.

Subjects: A total of 45 elderly MCI patients diagnosed according to research diagnostic criteria and 30 age-matched cognitively unimpaired controls.

Methods: Clinical assessment - Alzheimer’s disease Assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) for the assessment of cognitive functions, Alzheimer’s disease Cooperative Study scale for ADL in MCI (ADCS-MCI-ADL) for the assessment of impairments of complex ADL. Statistical evaluation - Mann-Whitney U tests for significant differences on measures of cognition and everyday functioning. Non-parametric correlations for associations between ADL and cognitive ability. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analyses to identify optimal cut-off scores on the ADCS-MCI-ADL and ADAS-cog scales to differentiate between MCI patients and controls. Binary logistic regression analyses to predict the diagnosis of MCI on the basis of the above-mentioned instruments.

Results: Patients scored significantly higher than controls on the ADAS-cog scale and significantly lower on the ADCS-MCI-ADL scale. There was a significant negative correlation of the above-mentioned scales in MCI patients (r = -0.46, P<0.01). Both instruments discriminated well between patients and controls (ADCS-MCI-ADL: optimal cut-off 52 points, sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.97; ADAS-cog: optimal cut-off 10 points, sensitivity 0.78, specificity 1.0). With regard to the linear predictor in the logistic regression built, both instruments were strong predictors of the diagnosis according to the diagnostic gold standard (ADCS-MCI-ADL: P = 0.002; ADAS-cog: P = 0.041).

Conclusion: Impairment of ADL is already present in MCI. Therefore, intact ADL cannot be used as a criterion to define the syndrome of MCI and to distinguish it from mild dementia. The assessment of complex ADL is probably useful for the diagnosis of MCI.

Keywords: mild cognitive impairment, activities of daily living, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, elderly.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
S. SALLOWAY and S. CORREIA
Alzheimer disease: Time to improve its diagnosis and treatment
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, January 1, 2009; 76(1): 49 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMENHome page
C. Woon Chi Tam, L. Chiu Wa Lam, H. F.K. Chiu, and V. W.C. Lui
Characteristic Profiles of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Chinese Older Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, July 1, 2007; 22(3): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. J. Golob, R. Irimajiri, and A. Starr
Auditory cortical activity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: relationship to subtype and conversion to dementia
Brain, March 1, 2007; 130(3): 740 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.