Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on April 25, 2006
Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afl004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective: to investigate the associations between chronic health conditions, psychosocial and environmental factors and catastrophic decline in mobility among older people. Design: longitudinal cohort. Setting: national sample living in private households. Participants: nine hundred and ninety-nine adults aged Measurements: catastrophic decline in mobility: inability to do any of the three activities of daily living items--walking 400 yards, climbing up and down stairs or steps and getting on a bus--having been capable of independently doing all three one year earlier. Results: similar annual rates of catastrophic decline were reported for men and women: 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-8.3] and 4.6% (2.4-8.6), respectively. Strong associations were found between catastrophic decline and age >70 years, hearing problems and health deterioration, odds ratio (OR) 3.7 (95% CI 1.1-11.8), 2.8 (1.1-7.3) and 4.3 (1.2-14.7), respectively. Poor perceptions of health, loss of control and feeling fearful also appeared to be important: below average summary psychological status, OR 6.5 (1.9-22.3). Inability to do heavy housework, carry heavy shopping or bend to cut own toenails, indicating poor functional reserve capacity, was strongly associated with decline, OR 6.8 (2.2-20.8). Conclusion: psychosocial factors are as strongly associated with catastrophic decline as deterioration in health status. Interventions to reduce the risk of catastrophic decline may require management of psychosocial problems as well as health condition components.
Received October 27, 2005
Accepted February 19, 2006
Article
Predicting catastrophic decline in mobility among older people
S. Ayis 1 *,
R. Gooberman-Hill 1,
A. Bowling 2,
and
S. Ebrahim 1
2 Research Unit for Ageing and Population Studies, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
S. Ayis, E-mail: s.ayis{at}bristol.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract
65 years at initial interview, of which 786 agreed to take part in a follow-up survey 12 months later, and 531 responded to the questionnaire.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. O'Hanlon and C. Twomey Mobility impairment in older adults InnovAiT, September 1, 2009; 2(9): 546 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ebrahim, J. Adamson, S. Ayis, A. Beswick, and R. Gooberman-Hill Locomotor disability: meaning, causes and effects of interventions J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 38 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jagger, R. Matthews, D. Melzer, F. Matthews, C. Brayne, and MRC CFAS Educational differences in the dynamics of disability incidence, recovery and mortality: Findings from the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS) Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 358 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


