Skip Navigation



Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on June 13, 2006

Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afl052
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/5/477    most recent
afl052v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Getliffe, K.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Getliffe, K.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received November 23, 2005
Accepted April 7, 2006

Article

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection in primary and community health care

Kathryn Getliffe 1 * and Teresa Newton 1

1 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, Hants SO17 1BJ, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kathryn Getliffe, E-mail: k.a.getliffe{at}soton.ac.uk


   Abstract

Introduction: although often a last resort, urinary catheterisation is a relatively common management option for bladder dysfunction in older people and others cared for in community settings. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a well-recognised source of increased morbidity and economic burden in acute care services, but much less is known about the prevalence and impact of CAUTI in primary and community care.

Objectives: the aim of this study was to examine the criteria and outcome measures used in reporting CAUTI, to identify sources and quality of data recorded on CAUTI and to determine a base-line prevalence rate for CAUTI in community settings.

Methods: (i) a mapping exercise to identify local, national and international sources of data on CAUTI and (ii) a retrospective prevalence survey of CAUTIs, recorded within three Primary Care Trusts in England during 1 month (October 2004).

Results: published or other recorded data on CAUTI in community settings were very limited. Criteria and outcome measures were variable and commonly failed to distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic CAUTI. A prevalence rate of 8.5% was determined by retrospective survey of patient records.

Conclusions: limitations in the quality and consistency of catheter-related information collected by healthcare services present a major obstacle to robust epidemiological analysis of risk and impact of CAUTI in primary and community care. Standardised routine data collection is essential to determine the magnitude of risk associated with CAUTI, to enable the development of a longitudinal database of long-term catheterised patients and to provide base-line data against which infection-control initiatives in primary and community care can be evaluated.

Keywords: community health services, elderly, infection control, urinary catheterization.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.