Skip Navigation



Age and Ageing Advance Access published online on February 10, 2007

Age and Ageing, doi:10.1093/ageing/afl165
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/2/130    most recent
afl165v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, V.
Right arrow Articles by Close, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, V.
Right arrow Articles by Close, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.

Systematic Review

Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings

Vicky Scott1,, Kristine Votova2, Andria Scanlan3 and Jacqueline Close4

1 British Columbia Injury Research & Prevention Unit and Ministry of Health, Office for Injury Prevention, 1515 Blanshard, Victoria, BC, V8W 3C8, Canada
2 Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada
3 Health Research Consultant, 1227 Rockland Avenue, Victoria BC, V8V 3J1, Canada
4 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia

Address correspondence to: Vicky Scott. Tel: (250) 952-1520; Fax: (250) 952-2072. Email: vicky.scott{at}gov.bc.ca

Objective: to conduct a systematic review of published studies that test the validity and reliability of fall-risk assessment tools for use among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings.

Methods: searches were conducted in EbscoHost and MEDLINE for published studies in the English language between January 1980 and July 2004, where the primary or secondary purpose was to test the predictive value of one or more fall assessment tools on a population primarily 65 years and older. The tool must have had as its primary outcome falls, fall-related injury or gait/balance. Only studies that used prospective validation were considered.

Findings: thirty-four articles testing 38 different tools met the inclusion criteria. The community setting represents the largest number of studies (14) and tools (23) tested, followed by acute (12 studies and 8 tools), long-term care (LTC) (6 studies and 10 tools) and home-support (4 studies and 4 tools). Eleven of the 38 tools are multifactorial assessment tools (MAT) that cover a wide range of fall-risk factors, and 27 are functional mobility assessment tools (FMA) that involve measures of physical activity related to gait, strength or balance.

Conclusion: fall-risk assessment tools exist that show moderate to good validity and reliability in most health service delivery areas. However, few tools were tested more than once or in more than one setting. Therefore, no single tool can be recommended for implementation in all settings or for all subpopulations within each setting.

Keywords: fall-risk assessment, older adults, systematic review, predictive value, elderly, systematic review

Received 2 December 2005; accepted in revised form 22 October 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
E. Nordin, N. Lindelof, E. Rosendahl, J. Jensen, and L. Lundin-olsson
Prognostic validity of the Timed Up-and-Go test, a modified Get-Up-and-Go test, staff's global judgement and fall history in evaluating fall risk in residential care facilities
Age Ageing, July 1, 2008; 37(4): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
T. Haines, S. S. Kuys, G. Morrison, J. Clarke, and P. Bew
Balance Impairment Not Predictive of Falls in Geriatric Rehabilitation Wards
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2008; 63(5): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
M. Vassallo, L. Poynter, J. C. Sharma, J. Kwan, and S. C. Allen
Fall risk-assessment tools compared with clinical judgment: an evaluation in a rehabilitation ward
Age Ageing, May 1, 2008; 37(3): 277 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. Ashburn, D. Hyndman, R. Pickering, L. Yardley, and S. Harris
Predicting people with stroke at risk of falls
Age Ageing, May 1, 2008; 37(3): 270 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
D. Oliver
Falls risk-prediction tools for hospital inpatients. Time to put them to bed?
Age Ageing, May 1, 2008; 37(3): 248 - 250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. W Muir, K. Berg, B. Chesworth, and M. Speechley
Use of the Berg Balance Scale for Predicting Multiple Falls in Community-Dwelling Elderly People: A Prospective Study
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2008; 88(4): 449 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
C. Beghe
Review: evidence from single studies shows that a few fall risk assessment tools can predict falls in elderly people
Evid. Based Med., December 1, 2007; 12(6): 186 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
K. Peri
Review: evidence from single studies shows that very few fall risk assessment tools can predict falls in elderly people
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2007; 10(4): 123 - 123.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.