<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Age and Ageing - current issue</title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Age and Ageing - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1468-2834</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>March 2010</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Age and Ageing</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0002-0729</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/145?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/148?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/152?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/154?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/156?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/197?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/217?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/253?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/265?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/272?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/280?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's View]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francis, R.M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's View]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's View</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/146?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[List of 2009 Reviewers]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/146?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francis, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp254</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[List of 2009 Reviewers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>147</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/148?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction to the new International Advisory Panel]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/148?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp261</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction to the new International Advisory Panel]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>148</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Introduction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/152?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nursing home funding -- deal or no deal ? -- an Irish perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/152?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robinson, D. J., O'Shea, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp253</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nursing home funding -- deal or no deal ? -- an Irish perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>152</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/154?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News and Reviews]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/154?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacLennan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News and Reviews]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>News and Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/156?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageing, neurodegeneration and Parkinson's disease]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/156?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Age is the largest risk factor for the development and progression of Parkinson&rsquo;s disease (PD). Ageing affects many cellular processes that predispose to neurodegeneration, and age-related changes in cellular function predispose to the pathogenesis of PD. The accumulation of age-related somatic damage combined with a failure of compensatory mechanisms may lead to an acceleration of PD with age. The formation of Lewy bodies may represent a marker for protective mechanisms against age-related dysfunction and degeneration of the nervous system. Mild parkinsonian signs may be present in older people, which are associated with reduced function. These may be due to age-related decline in dopaminergic activity, incidental Lewy body disease, degenerative pathologies (early PD and Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease) or vascular pathology. Ageing may affect the clinical presentation of PD with altered drug side effects, increased risk of developing dementia and an increased likelihood of admission to a nursing home. Progression of PD, including the development of dementia, and hallucinations is related to the age of the patient rather than the age of disease onset. PD may reflect a failure of the normal cellular compensatory mechanisms in vulnerable brain regions, and this vulnerability is increased by ageing. PD is one of the best examples of an age-related disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hindle, J. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp223</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageing, neurodegeneration and Parkinson's disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>161</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>156</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microscopic colitis -- a common cause of diarrhoea in older adults]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Diarrhoeal diseases are common in older populations and often markedly affect their quality of life. Although there are numerous potential causes, microscopic colitis (MC) is increasingly recognised as a major diagnostic entity in older individuals. MC is comprised of two distinct histological forms &mdash; collagenous colitis and lymphocytic colitis, both of which frequently occur in older populations. Recent studies suggest that between 10 and 30% of older patients investigated for chronic diarrhoea with an endoscopically normal appearing colon will have MC. It is unclear why MC is more common in older populations, but it is associated with both autoimmune disorders and several drugs that are commonly used by seniors. A definitive diagnosis can only be made with colonic biopsies. Since MC was first described in 1976 and only recently recognised as a common cause of diarrhoea, many practising physicians may not be aware of this entity. In this review, we outline the epidemiology, risk factors associated with MC, its pathophysiology, the approach to diagnosis and the management of these individuals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, J. J., Beck, P. L., Andrews, C. N., Hogan, D. B., Storr, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp243</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microscopic colitis -- a common cause of diarrhoea in older adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective:</b> to determine the effects of physical rehabilitation for older people resident in long-term care.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> systematic review of randomised controlled trials.</p>
<p><b>Data sources:</b> The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PEDro, British Nursing Index, ASSIA, IBSS, PsychINFO, DARE, HMIC, NHS EED, HTA, Web of Science, AsLib Index to UK Theses and Dissertation Abstracts, the National Research Register, Medical Research Council Register, CRIB, Current Controlled Trials and HSRPRoj.</p>
<p><b>Trials:</b> all randomised trials investigating physical rehabilitation for people permanently resident in long-term care aged &ge;60 years. The primary outcome was measures of activity restriction.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> 49 trials were identified involving 3,611 subjects with an average age of 82 years. Intervention duration was typically 12 weeks with a treatment intensity of three 30-min sessions per week. Exercise was the main component of the interventions. The mean attendance rate for 17 studies was 84% (range 71&ndash;97%). Thirty-three trials, including the nine trials recruiting over 100 subjects, reported positive findings, mostly improvement in mobility but also strength, flexibility and balance.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care is acceptable and potentially effective. Larger scale studies are needed to confirm the findings and should include longer term follow-up and assessment for possible harms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forster, A., Lambley, R., Young, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp247</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Systematic Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions to achieve long-term weight loss in obese older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> the prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing in older adults. Information is required about what interventions are effective in reducing obesity and influencing health outcomes in this age group.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>
<p><b>Data sources:</b> thirteen databases were searched, earliest date 1966 to December 2008, including Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane database and EMBASE.</p>
<p><b>Study selection:</b> we included studies with participants&rsquo; mean age &ge;60 years and mean body mass index &ge;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, with outcomes at a minimum of 1 year. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and differences resolved by consensus.</p>
<p><b>Data extraction:</b> nine eligible trials were included. Study interventions targeted diet, physical activity and mixed approaches. Populations included patients with coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> meta-analysis (seven studies) demonstrated a modest but significant weight loss of 3.0 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1&ndash;0.9] at 1 year. Total cholesterol (four studies) did not show a significant change: &ndash;0.36 mmol/l (95% CI &ndash;0.75 to 0.04). There was no significant change in high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein or triglycerides. In one study, recurrence of hypertension or cardiovascular events was significantly reduced (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.50&ndash;0.85). Six-minute walk test did not significantly change in one study. Health-related quality of life significantly improved in one study but did not improve in a second study.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> although modest weight reductions were observed, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the efficacy of weight loss programmes in older people.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Witham, M. D., Avenell, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp251</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions to achieve long-term weight loss in obese older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Grip strength and cardiovascular drug use in older people: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> reduced grip strength is associated with adverse health consequences, and there is interest in identifying modifiable influences. Cardiovascular drugs are commonly used by older people, but their effect on muscle strength is unclear.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> we investigated associations between cardiovascular drug use and grip strength among 1,572 men and 1,415 women, aged 59&ndash;73, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Forty-five percent of participants were taking a cardiovascular drug. Furosemide was associated with average decreases in grip strength of 3.15 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90, 5.39, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) among men and 2.35 kg (95% CI 0.93, 3.77, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) among women after adjustment for age and height. Corresponding differences for nitrates were 1.84 kg (95% CI 0.29, 3.39, <I>P</I> = 0.02) among men and 3.66 kg (95% CI 1.99, 5.33, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) among women. Calcium channel blockers and fibrates were associated with reduced grip among women. Statins were not associated with grip. The associations between grip strength and nitrate use in men and nitrate and fibrate use in women were robust to additional adjustment for co-morbidity.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> use of some cardiovascular drugs is associated with reduced grip strength in older people. These findings have potential implications for the functional ability of older people treated with these drugs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashfield, T. A., Syddall, H. E., Martin, H. J., Dennison, E. M., Cooper, C., Sayer, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Grip strength and cardiovascular drug use in older people: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageing and gait variability--a population-based study of older people]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> gait variability may be an important predictor of falls risk, but its characteristics are poorly understood.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> to examine the relationship between age and gait variability in a population-based sample of older people.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> cross-sectional study.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> in people aged 60&ndash;86  years (<I>n</I> = 412), temporal and spatial gait variability measures were recorded with a GAITRite walkway. Regression analysis was used to model the relationship between age and gait variability adjusting for height, weight and self-reported chronic disease. Further adjustment was made for gait speed to examine its influence on the associations.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> older age was associated with greater variability (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) in all gait measures. All relationships were linear, except that between age and step time variability, which was curvilinear in women. Adjusting for gait speed changed the magnitude of the age coefficient by 62&ndash;86% for temporal variability measures, 25% for step length variability and 5&ndash;12% for step width variability.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> age is linearly associated with greater intra-individual gait variability for most gait measures, except for step time variability in women. Gait speed may mediate the association between age and temporal variability measures. Further study is needed to understand the factors responsible for the greater gait variability with ageing.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Callisaya, M. L., Blizzard, L., Schmidt, M. D., McGinley, J. L., Srikanth, V. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageing and gait variability--a population-based study of older people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>197</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/197?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevalence and correlates of frailty among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/197?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> frailty, a multi-dimensional geriatric syndrome, confers a high risk for falls, disability, hospitalisation and mortality. The prevalence and correlates of frailty in the UK are unknown.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> frailty, defined by Fried, was examined among community-dwelling young-old (64&ndash;74 years) men (<I>n</I> = 320) and women (<I>n</I> = 318) who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, UK.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> the prevalence of frailty was 8.5% among women and 4.1% among men (<I>P</I> = 0.02). Among men, older age (<I>P</I> = 0.009), younger age of leaving education (<I>P</I> = 0.05), not owning/mortgaging one's home (odds ratio [OR] for frailty 3.45 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.01&ndash;11.81], <I>P</I> = 0.05, in comparison with owner/mortgage occupiers) and reduced car availability (OR for frailty 3.57 per unit decrease in number of cars available [95% CI 1.32, 10.0], <I>P</I> = 0.01) were associated with increased odds of frailty. Among women, not owning/mortgaging one's home (<I>P</I> = 0.02) was associated with frailty. With the exception of car availability among men (<I>P</I> = 0.03), all associations were non-significant (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.05) after adjustment for co-morbidity.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> frailty is not uncommon even among community-dwelling young-old men and women in the UK. There are social inequalities in frailty which appear to be mediated by co-morbidity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Syddall, H., Roberts, H. C, Evandrou, M., Cooper, C., Bergman, H., Sayer, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevalence and correlates of frailty among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>203</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>I</b><b>ntroduction:</b> osteoporosis is a common disease, and the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to rise with the growing elderly population. Immediately following, and probably several years after a hip fracture, patients, both men and women, have a higher risk of dying compared to the general population regardless of age. The aim of this study was to assess excess mortality following hip fracture and, if possible, identify reasons for the difference between mortality for the two genders.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> this is a nationwide register-based cohort study presenting data from the National Hospital Discharge Register on mortality, comorbidity and medication for all Danish patients (more than 41,000 persons) experiencing a hip fracture between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2002. Follow-up period was until 31 December 2005.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> we found a substantially higher mortality among male hip fracture patients than female hip fracture patients despite men being 4 years younger at the time of fracture. Both male and female hip fracture patients were found to have an excess mortality rate compared to the general population. The cumulative mortality at 12 months among hip fracture patients compared to the general population was 37.1% (9.9%) in men and 26.4% (9.3%) in women. In the first year, the risk of death significantly increased for women with increasing age (hazard ratio, HR: 1.06, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.06&ndash;1.07), the number of comedications (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03&ndash;1.05) and the presence of specific Charlson index components and medications described below. For men, age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.07&ndash;1.08), number of comedications (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04&ndash;1.07) and presence of different specific Charlson index components and medications increased the risk. Long-term survival analyses revealed that excess mortality for men compared with women remained strongly significant (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.65&ndash;1.75, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), even when controlled for age, fracture site, the number of medications, exposure to drug classes A, C, D, G, J, M, N, P, S and for chronic comorbidities.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> excess mortality among male patients cannot be explained by controlling for known comorbidity and medications. Besides gender, we found higher age and multimorbidity to be related to an increased risk of dying within the first year after fracture; acute complications might be one of the explanations. This study emphasises the need for particular rigorous postoperative diagnostic evaluation and treatment of comorbid conditions in the male hip fracture patient.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kannegaard, P. N., van der Mark, S., Eiken, P., Abrahamsen, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/210?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/210?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective</b>: this study aimed to perform a comprehensive validation of the 16-item and 7-item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) by investigating the overall structure and measurement properties, convergent and predictive validity and responsiveness to change.</p>
<p><b>Method</b>: five hundred community-dwelling older people (70&ndash;90 years) were assessed on the FES-I in conjunction with demographic, physiological and neuropsychological measures at baseline and at 12 months. Falls were monitored monthly and fear of falling every 3 months.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: the overall structure and measurement properties of both FES-I scales, as evaluated with item response theory, were good. Discriminative ability on physiological and neuropsychological measures indicated excellent validity, both at baseline (<I>n</I> = 500, convergent validity) and at 1-year follow-up (<I>n</I> = 463, predictive validity). The longitudinal follow-up suggested that FES-I scores increased over time regardless of any fall event, with a trend for a stronger increase in FES-I scores when a person suffered multiple falls in a 3-month period. Additionally, using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, cut-points were defined to differentiate between lower and higher levels of concern.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b>: the current study builds on the previously established psychometric properties of the FES-I. Both scales have acceptable structures, good validity and reliability and can be recommended for research and clinical purposes. Future studies should explore the FES-I's responsiveness to change during intervention studies and confirm suggested cut-points in other settings, larger samples and across different cultures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delbaere, K., Close, J. C. T., Mikolaizak, A. S., Sachdev, P. S., Brodaty, H., Lord, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/217?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haemorheological predictors of cognitive decline: the Edinburgh Artery Study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/217?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Introduction:</b> vascular risk factors and diseases can negatively impact cognitive function. Determinants of blood flow are implicated in thrombogenesis and ischaemic events, yet little is known about their relationship with cognition.</p>
<p><b>Methods</b>: blood rheology data were collected in 1987/88, and cognitive testing was performed in 1998/99 when the mean (&plusmn;standard deviation) age of the study sample was 73.1 years (&plusmn;5.0). Follow-up assessment was performed 4 years later. Information was collected on verbal declarative memory, non-verbal reasoning, verbal fluency, information processing speed and a general cognitive factor representing the variance common to the individual test scores.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: after controlling for age, sex and cognitive performance in 1998/99, blood viscosity (BV) (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and fibrinogen (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) predicted decline in non-verbal reasoning over 4 years. When estimated from pre-morbid level, decline in general cognition (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05), non-verbal reasoning (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and information processing speed (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) was associated with BV levels. Haematocrit (HCT) had similar effects (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01 to <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). All associations persisted after control for multiple confounders. When examined together, HCT but not BV independently predicted cognitive decline.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b>: blood rheology is independently related to cognitive decline in older people. The value of strategies aimed at preserving cognition through influencing blood rheology needs investigation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafnsson, S., Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Rumley, A., Lowe, G. D. O., Fowkes, F. G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haemorheological predictors of cognitive decline: the Edinburgh Artery Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>217</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Telomere length and psychological well-being in patients with chronic heart failure]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> psychological stress and depressive symptoms have been implicated with accelerated ageing and increased progression of diseases. Shorter telomere length indicates a more advanced biological age. It is unknown whether psychological well-being is associated with telomere length in patients with the somatic condition of chronic heart failure (CHF).</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> a cross-sectional analysis was used.</p>
<p><b>Setting:</b> patients were admitted to the hospital with signs and symptoms of CHF.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> the study aimed to assess the association between telomere length and psychological well-being in patients with CHF.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> telomere length was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 890 patients with New York Heart Association functional class II to IV CHF. We evaluated the perceived mental health by the validated RAND-36 questionnaire. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D), and the presence of type D personality was evaluated by the DS14.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> a lower perceived mental health on the RAND-36 score was associated with shorter telomere length. Adjustment for age and gender did not change our findings (standardised beta, 0.11; <I>P</I>-value, 0.002). Telomere length was not associated with the CES-D or DS14 score.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> decreased perceived mental health is associated with shorter leukocyte telomere length in patients with CHF. Future work should determine whether psychological stress accelerates biological ageing.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huzen, J., van der Harst, P., de Boer, R. A., Lesman-Leegte, I., Voors, A. A., van Gilst, W. H., Samani, N. J., Jaarsma, T., van Veldhuisen, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Telomere length and psychological well-being in patients with chronic heart failure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frailty and use of health and community services by community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> frailty is a concept used to describe older people at high risk of adverse outcomes, including falls, functional decline, hospital or nursing home admission and death. The associations between frailty and use of specific health and community services have not been investigated.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> the cross-sectional relationship between frailty and use of several health and community services in the last 12 months was investigated in 1,674 community-dwelling men aged 70 or older in the Concord Health and Ageing in Men study, a population-based study conducted in Sydney, Australia. Frailty was assessed using a modified version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> overall, 158 (9.4%) subjects were frail, 679 (40.6%) were intermediate (pre-frail) and 837 (50.0%) were robust. Frailty was associated with use of health and community services in the last 12 months, including consulting a doctor, visiting or being visited by a nurse or a physiotherapist, using help with meals or household duties and spending at least one night in a hospital or nursing home. Frail men without disability in activities of daily living were twice more likely to have seen a doctor in the previous 2 weeks than robust men (adjusted odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.21&ndash;3.44), independent of age, comorbidity and socio-economic status.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> frailty is strongly associated with use of health and community services in community-dwelling older men. The high level of use of medical services suggests that doctors and nurses could play a key role in implementation of preventive interventions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rochat, S., Cumming, R. G., Blyth, F., Creasey, H., Handelsman, D., Le Couteur, D. G., Naganathan, V., Sambrook, P. N., Seibel, M. J., Waite, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp257</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frailty and use of health and community services by community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis awaiting joint arthroplasty]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> the presence of osteoporosis in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) has important implications for understanding disease progression and providing optimal surgical and medical management.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis among patients with osteoarthritis awaiting total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty aged between 65 and 80 years.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> cross-sectional observational study.</p>
<p><b>Setting:</b> tertiary referral centre in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.</p>
<p><b>Subjects:</b> patients with osteoarthritis awaiting total knee hip arthroplasty aged between 65 and 80 years.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> lumbar spine, bilateral femoral and forearm bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> the cohort consisted of 199 patients with a mean age of 72 years (SD 4), and 113 (57%) were women. The overall rate of osteoporosis at any site was 23% (46/199) and a further 43% (85/199) of patients would have been classified as osteopaenic according to World Health Organization criteria. Osteoporosis was more commonly detected in the forearm (14%) than the lumbar spine (8.5%) and proximal femur of the index side (8.2%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> in summary, a significant proportion of patients with end-stage OA have osteoporosis but this diagnosis may be missed unless BMD measurements are performed at sites distant from joints affected by OA.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lingard, E. A., Mitchell, S. Y., Francis, R. M., Rawlings, D., Peaston, R., Birrell, F. N., McCaskie, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis awaiting joint arthroplasty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The association between various visual function tests and low fragility hip fractures among the elderly: a Malaysian experience]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> hip fractures are an increasing source of morbidity and mortality in older people. The role of visual function tests such as visual impairment, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity and visual field defects in low fragility hip fractures in Asian populations is not well understood.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> to determine the association between various visual function tests and low fragility hip fractures in an Asian population.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> case&ndash;control study.</p>
<p><b>Setting:</b> University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.</p>
<p><b>Subjects:</b> 108 cases aged &ge;55 years admitted with low fragility fractures and 108 controls (matched for age, gender and race).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> both cases and controls underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination, which included visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity and visual field testing.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> poorer visual acuity (odds ratio, OR = 4.08; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.44, 11.51), stereopsis (OR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.55, 8.38), contrast sensitivity (OR = 3.34, 95% CI: 1.48, 7.57) and visual field defects (OR = 11.60, 95% CI: 5.21, 25.81) increased the risk of fracture. Increased falls were associated with poorer visual acuity (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.04, 5.13), stereopsis (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.32), contrast sensitivity (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.05, 4.30) and visual field defects (OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.69, 6.86).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> impaired visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity and visual field defects are associated with an increased risk of low fragility hip fractures. We recommend that all patients aged &ge;55 should have an annual ophthalmological examination that includes visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and visual field testing to assess the risks for falls and low fragility fractures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chew, F. L. M., Yong, C.-K., Ayu, S. M., Tajunisah, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp259</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The association between various visual function tests and low fragility hip fractures among the elderly: a Malaysian experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heat-related mortality in residents of nursing homes]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> in population-based studies, age and morbidity were associated with heat-related mortality. The nursing home population reveals both factors and may represent a highly vulnerable subgroup. Therefore, temperature&ndash;mortality relationship was examined in residents of nursing homes.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> the association between daily ambient maximum temperature and mortality was analysed in 95,808 nursing home residents in southwest Germany between 2001 and 2005. Time series analyses were applied across age groups, sex and functional abilities. In addition, excess mortality was determined for the 2003 heat wave.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> mortality risk was lowest at maximum temperatures between 16 and 25.9&deg;C. Risk increased by 26 and 62% at days of 32.0&ndash;33.9 and 34&deg;C and more, respectively. In August 2003, heat caused &gt;400 additional deaths in the observed population and was followed by only a moderate mortality displacement in the following months. The excess number of deaths during the heat wave was particularly high in residents aged &ge;90 years and in residents with higher care needs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> high ambient temperature was associated with an increased mortality risk in all analysed subgroups of the nursing home population. Medical competence and supervision are available in nursing homes and should, therefore, be favourable preconditions for the implementation of preventive measures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klenk, J., Becker, C., Rapp, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp248</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heat-related mortality in residents of nursing homes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/253?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coronary heart disease risk factors and regional deprivation in England: does age matter?]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/253?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabassum, F., Breeze, E., Kumari, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coronary heart disease risk factors and regional deprivation in England: does age matter?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International in fall-prone older persons]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helbostad, J. L., Taraldsen, K., Granbo, R., Yardley, L., Todd, C. J., Sletvold, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp224</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International in fall-prone older persons]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: Accuracy in community-dwelling older adults]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/259-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dijkstra, B., Kamsma, Y., Zijlstra, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp249</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: Accuracy in community-dwelling older adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age is no barrier to success at very high altitudes]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stokes, S., Kalson, N. S., Earl, M., Whitehead, A. G., Tyrrell-Marsh, I., Frost, H., Davies, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp246</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age is no barrier to success at very high altitudes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/265?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experience of a rapid access blackout service for older people]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/265?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Newton, J. L., Marsh, A., Frith, J., Parry, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experience of a rapid access blackout service for older people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageing and endothelial progenitor cellrelease of proangiogenic cytokines]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kushner, E., Van Guilder, G., MacEneaney, O., Greiner, J., Cech, J., Stauffer, B., DeSouza, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp244</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageing and endothelial progenitor cellrelease of proangiogenic cytokines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/272?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Height and intelligence in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921: a longitudinal study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/272?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starr, J. M., Kilgour, A., Pattie, A., Gow, A., Bates, T. C., Deary, I. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:48 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Height and intelligence in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921: a longitudinal study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>272</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letter</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychosis due to non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis or marantic endocarditis is an uncommon and frequently terminal condition. We report non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis presenting as a psychotic illness. The underlying cause was found to be adenocarcinoma of the lung. The patient was nursed on a specialist joint medical/psychiatric unit. Many medical illnesses can present with psychosis in older people: this is the first case report of this presentation in non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clough, H., George, J., Duncan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp245</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychosis due to non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Report</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parkinson's Disease and Bone Health]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, P. D., Stone, D., Jones, S., Lewis, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parkinson's Disease and Bone Health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hypothesis: intestinal barrier permeability may contribute to cognitive dysfunction and dementia]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/278-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenner, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hypothesis: intestinal barrier permeability may contribute to cognitive dysfunction and dementia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Self-poisoning in older patients]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prescott, K., Le Jeune, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afp218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Self-poisoning in older patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Letter]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/279-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dudley, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Letter]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/39/2/280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saka, O., McGuire, A.J., Wolfe, C.D.A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:49 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>